Entries Comments


Movie Review: Gandhi

The buy clomid in canada needle electrodes transmit this information to a device called an price of celebrex oscilloscope, which displays electrical signals as waves. This article explores buy parlodel without prescription Charlotte's Web CBD, including the company's background and its range buy cheapest clomid of CBD products. A doctor may also modify a person's lipitor cheapest price medication or dosage as their kidney function changes over time. buy patanol without prescription Another explanation is carotid artery dissection, a serious condition that buspar canada can occur after an injury. Sometimes, it is difficult to buy advair from india avoid triggers, but a person can adopt certain strategies to toradol without a prescription help them deal with challenging situations or events. If SLE order benicar is causing other eye conditions, the treatment approach may vary buy cipro canada depending on the specific eye condition. People with this condition typically.
gandhi.jpg
Gandhi
Directed by Richard Attenborough
Written by John Briley
Columbia Pictures, 1982

The only film that was going to beat Gandhi in 1982 was Steven Spielberg’s E.T.: The Extra-Terrestrial, but the Academy, as it had done in 1977 with Star Wars, snubbed the box office smash in favor of something more traditional.  Gandhi’s epic telling won out over E.T.’s mass appeal.  Some trivia: Spielberg would later cast Gandhi director Richard Attenborough in 1993’s Jurassic Park.

It’s the story of the pacifist Mohandas Gandhi (Ben Kingsley, in a career-defining performance that easily won him the Oscar in his first try), who, as a British-educated lawyer traveling through South Africa in the late 1890’s, became troubled by the way the Indian people were treated by the British.  His fighting was never physical but heavily disobedient, and he and his followers took waves of uncontested abuse for it.

Later, his message after World War I would be taken to India, then a British stranglehold.  Gandhi’s struggle was not only with the laws handed down by the British, but the fact that India was split into several different religious groups, Muslim and Hindu chief among them, and many of his followers became tired of the abuse and resorted to violence.  Gandhi resorts to fasting and approaching death to keep his followers in check, knowing that peace is always a difficult, maybe impossible thing to perpetuate, and even when the Brits leave the area, India splits in two with the birth of Pakistan, which history has proven has not exactly been a total success.

As a movie, the story of Gandhi is, of course, often compelling.  But here, the 3 hour-plus runtime is felt, because even though it’s an important story, it isn’t terribly exciting overall.  In this way, Gandhi is one of those movies you could never watch one day and then even a month later feel the need to see again.  I can’t really speak out against its Best Picture win, though, mainly because as the Academy goes, it’s perfect and has important stature.

Besides E.T., Gandhi beat out Costa-Govras’ Missing, Sidney Lumet’s The Verdict, and the year’s distant second-place box office finisher, Sydney Pollack’s Tootsie.  It won 8 Oscars overall.        

Write a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.